Skip to content

Kourtney Kardashian as Boohoo’s face of sustainability is greenwashing

Kourtney Kardashian at the Met Gala

Greenwashing is basically when manufacturers pull PR stunts to persuade patrons that its strategies are ‘planet-friendly’ (Photograph by John Shearer/Getty Photographs)

Stepping from non-public jets and petrol-chugging vehicles; pictured draped throughout solar loungers in an array of bikinis (not two not often the identical), and laughing on yachts surrounded by crystal clear waters – Kourtney Kardashian Barker’s Instagram account may be very totally different to mine.

So you may hardly blame me for being shocked and totally disgusted that Boohoo selected her as its new sustainability ambassador.

Having a Kardashian because the face of sustainability is greenwashing at its best. It is the peak of hypocrisy.

Greenwashing is basically when manufacturers pull PR stunts to persuade patrons that its strategies are ‘planet-friendly,’ although they’ve made little or no real change, or efforts to be sustainable.

So, for Boohoo to make a girl like Kardashian Barker – who has finished subsequent to nothing of significance that has had a optimistic affect on the surroundings – ​​a sustainability ambassador, is genuinely disgraceful.

We take the surroundings significantly in my flat. Effectively, as severe as a 30-ish-year-old married couple residing in London can.

My husband and I do not eat meat, or drink milk. We do not drive, choosing biking or public transport; we’ve not been overseas this yr, and skip these plastic baggage in supermarkets when shopping for fruit and veg – shopping for them unfastened as a substitute.

We reuse cling movie and foil; recycle the whole lot (together with receipts), compost, extensively analysis palm oil in merchandise, and I’ve even been identified to not flush after I pee in my flat to save lots of water (I shut the lid although, which is greater than I can say for lots of males).

We solely purchase new garments as a final resort – shopping for secondhand if we are able to, or from a ‘respected’ producer with environmental claims that rise up. I’ve not shopped at Amazon or ASOS in years, and I’ve proudly by no means shopped at Shein, Fairly Little Factor, Missguided, or Boohoo.

In distinction, Kourtney Kardashian Barker is pictured in a brand new outfit or swimsuit consistently in a lavish, distant location throughout the globe on her Instagram. Locations we may solely dream of seeing.

She’s commonly clocked frolicking on one in all her super-rich household’s luxurious non-public jets – Kim’s is value $150million (£129million), reportedly costing her $400,000 in gasoline, whereas her sister Kylie makes nine-minute journeys in her $72million (£62million) jet.

However it’s OK, everybody: Kourtney flew business along with her household final month and shared a submit in regards to the world’s rising C02 charges to her Instagram tales earlier this yr, with the phrases: ‘Time to get our sh*t collectively’. Although her sister Ella Kim’s non-public jet utilization emits 609.8 instances extra carbon dioxide than the common individual in a single yr, in some way, this warrants Kourtney to be the face of sustainability at Boohoo.

It stinks of privilege.

In 2019, Boohoo was named by the Environmental Audit Committee (EAC) one of many UK’s least sustainable trend manufacturers – this was because of the firm apparently not doing sufficient to cut back its carbon footprint.

The next yr, moral model rankings website and app Good On You rated Boohoo ‘Not Good Sufficient’ due to it not utilizing eco-friendly supplies, with ‘no proof’ that it is taking ‘significant motion’ to cut back its utilization of hazardous chemical compounds – or water.

The extremely quick trend model, reported by Vice in 2020 to have uploaded practically 800 distinctive gadgets of clothes per week, undoubtedly provides to the 1.2billion tonnes of CO2 the textile trade annually – greater than worldwide aviation and transport mixed.

Kourtney Kardashian and Travis Barker kissing on a boat

Having a Kardashian because the face of sustainability is greenwashing at its best (Image: Robino Salvatore/GC Photographs)

Shockingly, garments assortment firm Garments Support estimated that 30% of our undesirable clothes goes to landfill – value £140million – after a median of 5 weeks’ utilization, with 35% of microplastics discovered within the ocean comes direct from artificial clothes, too.

Boohoo has come underneath hearth a number of instances for over staffing points, too. In 2020, an undercover reporter alleged its employees in Leicester have been paid as little as £3.50 an hour – which is nearly half the nationwide minimal age for folks over 18, regardless of the actual fact the model was estimated to be value £3.5billion final yr.

In accordance with garment employees’ rights group Labor Behind the Label, employees apparently labored via lockdown, with claims of Boohoo suppliers working with out social-distancing measures inside factories, whereas the model’s boss Mahmud Kamani, whose firm denied any unsuitable doing, was reportedly set to get a £50million bonus final yr (if particular situations have been met).

On the again of those allegations, Boohoo confronted a doable US import ban final yr as a result of the marketing campaign group Liberty Shared claimed it wasn’t doing sufficient to cease compelled labor in its factories. The model pleaded ignorance, saying it was ‘not conscious’ of such investigations.

Enter Kourtney Kardashian. Boohoo shelled out for a widely known face and socially-acceptable physique, of which she is reportedly value $65million, to be a part of a classy, topical marketing campaign about sustainability.

I am hardly shocked although, manufacturers like Boohoo are famend for shelling out on ‘scorching’ names of the second to steer advertising campaigns, together with earlier Love Island contestants Maura Higgins, India Reynolds, Kaz Crossley, Alexandra Cane and Kendall Knight for its ladies’s vary, and Josh Denzel and Wes Nelson for BoohooMAN.

Let’s not neglect about Molly-Mae Hague being awarded the highest job of Inventive Director at PrettyLittleThing for… being a runner-up in Love Island. Or the numerous modeling contracts and clothes strains influencers contemporary from the Love Island villa handle to bag with different on-line trend manufacturers, armed merely with fairly, wrinkle-free faces and pockets filled with followers.

On her first assortment launching immediately, Kourtney acknowledged that she was ‘involved in regards to the impacts of quick trend on our planet’, and is about to launch a ‘sustainable’ capsule with the model, mockingly with recommendation for customers on the right way to store extra ethically , in addition to result in social content material collection.

The vary is priced from £5 to £75, that includes clothes made out of recycled polyester and recycled cotton. Revolutionary.

On one hand, you could possibly argue that it is a good factor – drawing the crowds of Kardashian sheep in who could by no means have thought of the planet or sustainability. Ones that will now be eco-conscious on the premise {that a} well-known face says so.

Though I feel it is silly, it may very well be helpful. I am going to consider it once I see it, although.

However, when you’re buying at Boohoo within the first place, I am sorry, however there is no approach that you simply truly care in regards to the planet – given its alarming previous, and current.

It is time to cease maintaining with the Kardashians, and ditch quick trend’s hypocrisy for good. These celebrities do not reside in the actual world, with real-life issues so do not buy into this newest facade. It is solely going to make issues worse for us and for future generations.

Low cost garments come at a excessive price – a price to employee’s wellbeing, and to the planet.

You are not going to be such a fairly little factor in your new togs when the world is on hearth, in spite of everything.

Do you’ve got a narrative you’d wish to share? Get in contact by emailing jess.austin@metro.co.uk.

Share your views within the feedback under.

MORE : Kourtney Kardashian stops grieving IVF journey with husband Travis Barker: ‘It was loads’

MORE : No, Kourtney Kardashian wouldn’t eat poop to look youthful like her sister Kim: ‘That is the place I draw the road’

MORE : Kourtney Kardashian royally roasted over ‘sustainable’ collaboration with Boohoo

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.