Skip to content

Parkland protection convinces some that killer deserves mercy

The sudden finish of the protection case within the Parkland mass taking pictures trial this week drew criticism of and from the presiding choose, quickly overshadowing the most important query at situation — was sufficient proof offered to persuade a jury to spare the defendant’s life?

It is not possible to say for positive—juries are notoriously unpredictable. However a minimum of one skilled, and a few trial observers, say they might not be shocked if the jury within the Marjory Stoneman Douglas mass taking pictures case had been to point out mercy towards confessed gunman Nikolas Cruz.

“I might a lot quite be the protection than the prosecution at this level,” mentioned Nova Southeastern College legislation professor Bob Jarvis. The state has to persuade 12 jurors to condemn Cruz to demise, he defined. The protection wants just one to say no. With one vote in his favor, Cruz can be sentenced to life in jail.

Jarvis predicted the protection would truly prevail. The overwhelming proof of guilt and premeditation, the “heinous atrocious and merciless” acts that resulted in 17 deaths, and the psychological anguish suffered by wounded college students who knew they had been residing by means of their final moments might be offset by the popularity that the shooter suffered from psychological well being issues that had been lengthy acknowledged however by no means adequately addressed.

The protection known as 26 witnesses over 11 days to current its case, specializing in Cruz’s organic mom’s alcohol and drug abuse whereas she was pregnant with him, and following it up along with his adoptive mom’s repeated, insufficient and finally failed efforts to assist cope with his more and more violent outbursts.

Fetal alcohol spectrum dysfunction was recognized because the more than likely reason for his lifelong battle with psychological sickness, in keeping with protection consultants.

“This jury has three or 4 individuals who have expertise with psychological well being points,” Jarvis mentioned. “He had a foul break proper from the beginning. I will likely be shocked if this jury decides to carry again a death-penalty verdict.”

Assist for that view comes from extra than simply the everyday anti-death penalty advocates who would by no means select execution over life in jail.

Fort Lauderdale jeweler Brian Keno, who describes himself as a conservative death-penalty supporter who boasts of his help for the Second Modification proper to maintain and bear arms, mentioned he couldn’t think about sentencing Cruz to demise after listening to the protection case.

“I do not know if mercy is the appropriate phrase,” Keno mentioned. “It isn’t like a Ted Bundy state of affairs the place he did this over and over at completely different instances and completely different locations. The child had critical psychological well being points. He by no means had an opportunity. It ought to by no means have gotten to the purpose the place he received the gun within the first place.

“I could not pull the swap,” Keno mentioned.

Any juror who holds out on the demise penalty would have to take action 17 instances, as soon as for every sufferer. And whereas the strain to simply accept demise for a minimum of one will likely be excessive, Jarvis prompt holding out would get simpler with every vote.

Protection attorneys initially appeared to point they might name almost 80 witnesses, so few had been anticipating the protection workforce to relaxation after the twenty sixth. Prosecutors will start presenting a rebuttal case on Sept. 27.

Broward Circuit Decide Elizabeth Scherer raised eyebrows with a blistering criticism of the protection workforce. Consultants mentioned they may sympathize with the choose’s frustration together with her, although they may not defend her outburst together with her.

“We’ll be speaking about this in legislation faculty for years to return,” mentioned Jarvis, who criticized Scherer for letting her feelings get one of the best of her. Scherer is predicted to rule Monday on a movement to have her step except for the case.

Breaking News Alerts

Breaking Information Alerts

because it occurs

Get updates on growing tales as they occur with our free breaking information e mail alerts.

In a typical case, prosecutors and protection attorneys telegraph the broad strokes of their plans, together with how lengthy they count on their case to take and what number of witnesses they’ll name. However that courtesy can’t be taken without any consideration, and the Parkland mass taking pictures trial has by no means been a typical case.

“If you’re dealing with a case of this nature, with 22 people on the jury, you need to know what’s coming. You all the time need to be ready,” mentioned retired Broward Decide Paul Backman, who dealt with quite a few death-penalty circumstances. “Attorneys prefer to know which witnesses will likely be known as to allow them to be ready that day for that witness.”

Protection attorneys within the Cruz case had accused a prosecutor per week earlier of contacting and making an attempt to intimidate a witness, although they didn’t file a proper grievance with Scherer. The episode led protection attorneys to be much less open about which witnesses they meant to name subsequent, culminating within the choice to relaxation their case with none advance phrase.

Backman known as it “dangerous type” that appeared designed to impress the choose right into a response that may very well be the premise of an enchantment.

However, Backman added, a death-penalty trial is finally adversarial, and the protection isn’t required to make the job simple for the prosecution or the choose.

“They haven’t any obligation in any respect,” he mentioned.

Rafael Olmeda may be reached at rolmeda@sunsentinel.com954-356-4457 or on Twitter @rolmeda

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.